Friday, 23 August 2013

Putting the Pro in Prosumption





Prosumption, if not already gathered, is a combination of production and consumption. The prosumption model, coined by Ritzer & Jurgenson (2010), saw the importance of both production and consumption as one concept together. It saw how the individual has shifted to becoming more empowered in their consumption. Rather than blindly consume something that has been produced, we consume something and produce our own meaning from it and share it with others. In the words of Davis (2011, p.3), “we are what we buy, and we buy because of who we are. It requires only a very small stretch to apply this to the prosumption of identity”.  Additionally, we can interpret this in terms of brands, we buy a certain brand because it resonates with who we are, for example we buy the newest Samsung S4, because we like to have the latest things, in turn producing our identity as a tech savvy individual.


 In my case, identity prosumption can be easily related to my job as fashion retail assistant.  
As a fashion retail employee, I must consume the product, which is purchasing the brands clothing items. Considering that my uniform involves wearing that specific brand, I make sure to buy various items. As a result, I consume that specific brand because I identify with working there, by consuming the clothes I produce my identity as an employee. In turn when I purchase or try on clothes in my store and grow a liking towards, I then share it with friends and especially customers, thus producing the clothing experience for others. In some way, this is what we call a brand ambassador.




 I am a consumer, but also the producer of advertising and marketing for my workplace. I do this because it is my job, but I go further because I am a Prosumer, given that I enjoy what I’m consuming, and willing to produce the same thing for others.
It is no surprise that with the growing development of the Internet and social media platforms, our power to share opinions and produce content has become second nature. It is an age in which we don’t have to blindly consume from whatever is produced for us, we have the power to interpret, dissect, and produce different meanings or experiences (Davis & Jurgenson, 2011).   




_______


Curiosity Killed The Consumer, Viewed 20th August 2013, <http://curiositykilledtheconsumer.wordpress.com/2012/06/02/do-you-prosume-how-the-do-it-yourself-trend-changes-the-relation-between-producer-and-consumer/>


Davis, J 2011, “Prosuming Identity: The Production and Consumption of Transableism on Transabled.org”, American Behavioral Scientist,

Epoch Times, Viewed 20th August 2013, <http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/business/the-marketing-corner-does-social-coupon-work-it-depends-45721.html>



Jenny Davis & Nathan Jurgenson, 12th September 2011, "Prosuming Identity Online", Cyborgology, viewed 23rd August 2013, <http://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2011/09/12/prosuming-identity-online/>


Ritzer, G Jurgenson, N 2010, "Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital 'Prosumer', Journal of Consumer Culture,  vol. 10, no `, pp. 13-36

Friday, 2 August 2013

From reading books to Facebook

Through Facebook, many people are able to reconnect with lost friends or family, keep in contact with them, and foster new friendships. Furthermore, being exposed to a diversity of views on Facebook, mainly through status updates and comments, has greatly helped me open my mind to many viewpoints.

Ironically the negative influence that Facebook has given me is the fact that everyone uses it. From spending countless hours plugged in with everyone, I was simply.. addicted. So I decided to deactivate my account. Yet within the first week I felt the repercussions. Without Facebook I felt like I was missing out on news and events happening, that slowly a gap was beginning to form between my friends and myself. After a few solid weeks I had to give in, I had to stay updated and connected.

Source: Socialdon


Respectively, these two experiences resonate with certain aspects of post modernity and the inequality of our globalised world.

Firstly, post modernity embodies the defiance of dominant ideas. In its most basic sense, post modernity is the belief in more than one answer, instead of just one dominant narrative. For instance, many things have  been publicised to us in the media, in which we just take that on face value. However once social media emerged, capabilities of personal opinion were heightened. Now I am able to read diverging views and supporting comments on a world breaking issue or controversy on sites such as BBC Have Your Say Facebook group.
Source: Screenshot by Brittany Chu

This has led me to realise we are now a world that is capable of sharing views locally and nationally, I now have the power to see what other people are thinking on a topic, and in turn share my own views. According to Hachten (2002, p. 13) "Powerful technotronic forces are binding the world together". 
However it must be remembered that not all nations have the luxury of participating in this global digital society. "The development gap between advanced economies and least developed countries has been widening" (Nederveen 2004, p.13).   





For instance, those in 3rd world nations are missing out on the opportunities that globalisation offers. For instance, there are numerous news stories on the fight for human rights populating the media, but without the access, those in least developed nations are kept in the dark. In some way, this coincides with how I felt without Facebook, because I too was out of the loop.

This led me to believe that our world is increasingly digitised, and without the technology, we may be left behind.




Facebook World, Viewed 28th July 2013,
 <http://www.socialdon.com/blog/rules-capture-smm-facebook/>

Globalisation Images, Viewed 28th July 2013, <http://formacionvargas.com/cdd/courses/CURSO3/images-globalisation>


Hatchen, WA & Scotton, JF 2002, "News communication for a new global system", The world news prism: global media in an era of terrorism, 6th ED, Iowa State Press, Ames, p. 13

Nederveen, PJ 2004, "Globalization: consensus and controversies", Globalization and culture: globale melange, Rowan & Littlefield, Lanham, pp. 13